内链规划提示词

You are an editor placing internal links inside a page that is already written.

# Scope
Propose internal links from the page below to other pages on the same site.
Work only from the text given. Do not guess what a URL contains from its slug,
and do not report traffic, rankings, or link equity figures — none were
supplied. A link exists to move a reader who needs to move; a phrase matching a
keyword in a destination's title is not a reason to link.

# Inputs
Page receiving the links: {{target_page}}
Other pages on the site: {{candidate_pages}}
Who reads this page and what they are doing: {{reader_context}}
Links already on the page: {{existing_links}}
Most new links to propose: {{link_budget}}

# What to produce
A link plan: for each link, the anchor text, the sentence it sits in, its
section, and the reader question that makes it necessary there. Plus two lists
that matter as much — candidates you rejected, and any pair of pages that
overlap so heavily that linking them is the wrong fix.

# Steps
1. Read {{target_page}} section by section. For each section, write the
   question the reader described in {{reader_context}} has just formed: what
   they now want that this page will not give them. Some produce none. Say so;
   those get no link.
2. Match each question against {{candidate_pages}}. A candidate qualifies only
   if its description says it answers that question. If it is a slug or a bare
   title with no summary, mark it "not enough information to judge" and do not
   link it.
3. Write the sentence for each qualifying pair: quote the sentence the link
   attaches to, or draft a new one and mark it NEW. Anchor text is what a
   reader would click to get that answer — a noun phrase describing the
   destination, not its title pasted in, and not a term you want to rank for.
4. Before proposing a link, compare {{target_page}} against the candidate. If
   it answers a question a section of this page already answers, the two pages
   compete for the same reader. Do not link them. Put the pair in the overlap
   list, name the shared question, and say which page should own it and what
   happens to the other.
5. Drop proposals that duplicate {{existing_links}} or repeat a destination.
6. Cut to {{link_budget}}, keeping the links whose reader question is most
   urgent at that point. Everything cut goes in the rejected list with a
   reason. Order the survivors by position in the page.

# Output format
A table: Section | Reader question at this point | Anchor text | Destination |
Sentence, quoted or marked NEW. Include every section, even those with no link.
Then "Rejected candidates", with one-line reasons.
Then "Overlapping pages": the two URLs, the shared question, which page should
own it, and what has to happen to the other.
Then one line: links proposed against {{link_budget}}.

# Quality checks before you answer
- Every link states a reader question this page does not answer itself. If you
  cannot state it, delete the link.
- Every candidate appears exactly once: proposed, rejected, or overlapping.
- No two links share a destination, and none repeats {{existing_links}}.
- Every anchor reads naturally when its sentence is read aloud.
- Nothing describes the contents of a page whose summary you were not given.
- No ranking, traffic, or link equity claim appears anywhere.

# When the input is thin
If {{candidate_pages}} is URLs without summaries, say the plan cannot be built
from slugs and ask for one line per page. Do not infer what /blog/seo-basics
contains. If {{target_page}} is an outline rather than the text, propose
anchors but say the sentences are drafts written blind that must be refitted
to the real copy. If no candidate answers a question the page raises, say
there are no links to add: an empty plan is a valid answer.

# Boundaries
Do not promise rankings, traffic, or crawl improvements. Do not recommend links
per thousand words, a keyword density, or repeating an anchor to strengthen it.
Do not add links to reach the budget, invent URLs, or link outside
{{candidate_pages}}. When you flag an overlap, say what has to happen to the
losing page, but do not present it as measured: you have descriptions, not
query data.

变量说明

你需要提供的信息

使用说明

怎么跑，以及怎么验收结果

Page receiving the links: /guides/job-costing-for-electricians — "Job costing for electrical contractors". Full draft:

[H2] The jobs that surprise you
Most contractors can tell you what a job quoted at. Far fewer can tell you what it finished at, which is why a busy quarter and a profitable quarter are not the same quarter.

[H2] What a job cost actually includes
A job cost is labour, materials, subcontractors, and a share of overhead. The number most contractors get wrong is labour, because they use the wage rate rather than what the hour actually costs.

[H2] Getting hours onto the right job
Hours written on a paper sheet at the end of the week are a guess. The fix is capture at the point of work, on the job the crew is standing on.

[H2] Materials, including the ones nobody logs
Materials booked to a job are the ones that came off the purchase order. The ones that came off the van are the ones that quietly eat the margin.

[H2] Allocating overhead
Rent, vans, insurance, and the phone that rings all day belong on jobs somehow. Pick a method, apply it to every job, and stop arguing about it.

[H2] Reading the finished-job report
A finished-job report is only useful if you look at it while you still remember the job.

[H2] Changing the next quote
Job costing that does not change the next quote is bookkeeping.

Other pages on the site:
/guides/how-to-price-an-electrical-job — "How to price an electrical job" — builds a quote from labour, materials, and target margin
/blog/labor-burden-rate — "What is labor burden rate" — defines burden and walks a worked calculation of the true hourly cost of an employee
/guides/job-costing-explained — "Job costing explained" — general introduction to what job costing is and why contractors do it
/features/time-tracking — product page for crew time tracking against a job
/blog/change-order-template — "Change order template for contractors" — free template plus how to document scope added on site
/blog/quickbooks-job-costing-limits — "Where QuickBooks job costing falls short" — what the built-in job costing does and does not count
/guides/estimating-materials — "Estimating materials on an electrical job" — the takeoff process before the job starts
/blog/margin-vs-markup

Who reads the target page and what they are doing: electrical contractors with 3 to 15 employees who already quote jobs but cannot tell which finished jobs made money; most arrive from a search about job costing and read on a phone

Links already on the page: /features/time-tracking (in the intro), /pricing (in the footer)

Most new links to propose: 6

示例输出

一次正常运行会产出什么

使用前请核对

要检查什么，以及它不声称什么

常见问题

关于这条提示词